Since I have been here, I have talked to many Ghanaians about my interest in development and I have realized that maybe this term means something different across cultures. In Ghana, I have found that most people are very content and happy in their daily lives. It is not to say they are not frustrated with certain inadequacies, but does it mean that I should hold out the vision of a new Ghana to be so convenient and developed as that of the US? Well, maybe not.
I spoke to a few Ghanaians about this and they reminded me that in the US many are in debt and live at a standard of living that is inflated due to credit lines that support vast sums of debt. In Ghana, this credit is difficult to come by and things are "pay as you go". Paul and Shadrack, Ghanaians, explained that although it would be nice for Ghana to have this purchasing power, it is not something they need for happiness.
As far as frustrations go, these two students at the university told me that though student voice is acknowledged when problems occur, it is not always addressed and is often neglected. This could be because of the high extend of demand for goods and services while a low supply exists; this creates a monopoly or imbalance of power in favor of producers. Thus, the system often doesn't change because Ghanaian consumers have little choice like we in the US.
But, both students were confident that Ghana will improve to fix the problems at hand. I really were inspired by their optimism and desire to hold fast to their nationality as Ghanaians.
I thought about their comments and considered that maybe its best to ensure that extreme poverty is eradicated and there is a comfortable health, food, education and housing standard through growth promotion. Beyond that, it might actually get ambiguous as to what more Ghanaians would need "developed". Maybe at that point it's best to allow their marketplace to determine that and restrain from imposing any outsider visions of development.
I thought about their comments and considered that maybe its best to ensure that extreme poverty is eradicated and there is a comfortable health, food, education and housing standard through growth promotion. Beyond that, it might actually get ambiguous as to what more Ghanaians would need "developed". Maybe at that point it's best to allow their marketplace to determine that and restrain from imposing any outsider visions of development.
